Taking Action in Hong Kong is in America’s Moral and Economic InterestThe Honorable Newt Gingrich
As the Hong Kong protests continue and the calls for freedom for the people of Hong Kong become more widespread, the United States now has an opportunity to take action.
More than 20 years after the British handover of Hong Kong to China in 1997, the high degree of autonomy and freedoms that were promised to the Hong Kong people have been suppressed and violated by the ruling Chinese Communist Party. Though the extradition bill that ignited these protests has been withdrawn, the demonstrations have evolved into demands for Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam’s resignation, an investigation into police brutality, the release of arrested demonstrators and more democratic freedom.
Indeed, public dialogue platforms for protesters to voice concerns are being organized by Lam, but concrete progress toward protecting the rights entitled to the Hong Kong people remain elusive. The Hong Kong police have even stooped to dehumanizing the protesters. Recent footage was released showing officers kicking what a senior police official described as a “yellow object”—when it was clearly a human being lying on the ground dressed in a yellow shirt.
Leaders in Congress on both sides of the aisle have made strong statements condemning the Chinese Communist Party and Hong Kong government’s exploits—but now is the time to attach action to words.
Congress can do this by passing the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 that was introduced by Congressman Chris Smith and Senator Marco Rubio. This bill will hold Hong Kong and Chinese Communist Party officials accountable for their promises to protect the rights and freedoms of the Hong Kong people.
In 1984, under China’s “one country, two systems” model, China signed a Joint Declaration with the British that would give Hong Kong a “high degree of autonomy” after the 1997 handover. It also protected Hong Kong’s rights and freedoms “including those of the person, of speech, of the press, of assembly, of association, of travel, of movement, of correspondence, of strike, of choice of occupation, of academic research and of religious belief.” The Joint Declaration further promised to uphold the rule of lawand protect human rights and Hong Kong’s 1997 Basic Law, which identified democratic elections as an “ultimate aim.”
In 1992, the United States passed the Hong Kong Policy Act, which resulted in Hong Kong being treated separately from the rest of mainland China in terms of trade, commerce, immigration, investment, and cultural and educational collaborations. However, while Hong Kong has grown to become an international economic and business hub (the U.S. was Hong Kong’s No. 2 trading partner in 2018), it has not evolved into the democratic and free “special administrative region” of China that was promised decades ago.
As Hong Kong moves toward what a report by the British House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee called “One Country, One and a Half Systems”—with the Communist Party’s approach being closer to a “One Country, One System” model—the United States must not turn a blind eye to the violations against Hong Kong’s freedoms and autonomy.
Under the 1992 Hong Kong Policy Act, Hong Kong’s special treatment is based upon its maintenance of its promised autonomy. These privileges, however, can be selectively suspended by the president through executive order.
The proposed Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act expands on this by directing “various departments to assess whether political developments in Hong Kong justify changing Hong Kong’s unique treatment under U.S. law.” It requires the State Department to annually certify and report to Congress whether Hong Kong’s status of autonomy, as well as the government’s adherence to protecting civil liberties and upholding of the rule of law, justify its continued special status.